Author
Listed:
- Marialuisa Cavelti
- Raphaela M. Tschümperlin
- Daniela Hubl
- Zeno Kupper
- Franz Caspar
- Stefan Westermann
Abstract
Addressing motives determining behavior and experiences of people in treatment for psychosis could improve the therapeutic relationship. This pilot study explored the association between the concordance of clients’ and clinicians’ ratings of clients’ motivational goals and the therapeutic relationship in the treatment of psychosis. Twenty in- and outpatients diagnosed with a psychotic disorder in a general psychiatric setting answered measures addressing motivational goals and the therapeutic relationship. Fifteen clinicians rated their clients’ motivational goals and psychopathology. The concordance between clients’ and clinicians’ ratings of approach goals was not associated with clients’ ratings of the therapeutic relationship. However, a higher concordance in avoidance goals ratings was significantly correlated with less satisfaction with the therapeutic relationship. This finding might be understood in light of explicit (i.e. conscious) and implicit (i.e. non-conscious) avoidance goals: The more difficulties clinicians had in recognizing their clients’ implicit goals, the more they may have only rated and considered the clients’ explicit goals. This could have resulted in both a higher concordance rating between clients and clinicians, and less client satisfaction with the therapeutic relationship (because of unintended threats for implicit avoidance goals). Future studies with larger samples are needed that separately examine explicit and implicit motivational goals of people in treatment for psychosis.
Suggested Citation
Marialuisa Cavelti & Raphaela M. Tschümperlin & Daniela Hubl & Zeno Kupper & Franz Caspar & Stefan Westermann, 2018.
"Therapeutic relationship and concordance of client- and clinician-rated motivational goals in treatment of people with psychosis: an exploratory study,"
Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 90-98, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:90-98
DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2018.1449885
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:90-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.