IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpstxx/v71y2017i2p249-264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Migrant Border Crossing Study: A methodological overview of research along the Sonora–Arizona border

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel E. Martínez
  • Jeremy Slack
  • Kraig Beyerlein
  • Prescott Vandervoet
  • Kristin Klingman
  • Paola Molina
  • Shiras Manning
  • Melissa Burham
  • Kylie Walzak
  • Kristen Valencia
  • Lorenzo Gamboa

Abstract

Increased border enforcement efforts have redistributed unauthorized Mexican migration to the United States (US) away from traditional points of crossing, such as San Diego and El Paso, and into more remote areas along the US–Mexico border, including southern Arizona. Yet relatively little quantitative scholarly work exists examining Mexican migrants’ crossing, apprehension, and repatriation experiences in southern Arizona. We contend that if scholars truly want to understand the experiences of unauthorized migrants in transit, such migrants should be interviewed either at the border after being removed from the US, or during their trajectories across the border, or both. This paper provides a methodological overview of the Migrant Border Crossing Study (MBCS), a unique data source on Mexican migrants who attempted an unauthorized crossing along the Sonora–Arizona border, were apprehended, and repatriated to Nogales, Sonora in 2007–09. We also discuss substantive and theoretical contributions of the MBCS.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel E. Martínez & Jeremy Slack & Kraig Beyerlein & Prescott Vandervoet & Kristin Klingman & Paola Molina & Shiras Manning & Melissa Burham & Kylie Walzak & Kristen Valencia & Lorenzo Gamboa, 2017. "The Migrant Border Crossing Study: A methodological overview of research along the Sonora–Arizona border," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(2), pages 249-264, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpstxx:v:71:y:2017:i:2:p:249-264
    DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2017.1306093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00324728.2017.1306093
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00324728.2017.1306093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpstxx:v:71:y:2017:i:2:p:249-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpst20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.