IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v24y2024i6p519-534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining the key performance indicators on game outcomes in NBA based on quantile regression analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Wenbo Zhou
  • Pierpaolo Sansone
  • Zhiqiang Jia
  • Miguel-Angel Gomez
  • Feng Li

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to (i) determine the effect of KPIs on game outcomes for NBA teams; and (ii) compare the result difference between multiple linear regression (MLR) and quantile regression (QR) analysis. Data were collected for a total of 2,322 games in the 2020–2022 NBA regular seasons and play-in games. QR and MLR were adopted to analyse the relationship between KPIs and game outcomes. The results revealed that game outcomes were associated with two-point percentage, three-point percentage, free-throw percentage, offensive rebounds, assists, defensive rebounds, turnovers, steals, fouls, and game pace, but not with blocks, opponent quality, and game location. Differences were reported between MLR and QR analysis in free-throw percentage and fouls. This study showed that the QR analysis is more sensitive to identifying the effect of KPIs on game outcomes than MLR. The insights provided by QR analysis can guide more effective team strategies and player selection, emphasising the critical need for sports analysts and practitioners to consider the appropriate statistical methods when evaluating performance indicators in basketball and other sports.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenbo Zhou & Pierpaolo Sansone & Zhiqiang Jia & Miguel-Angel Gomez & Feng Li, 2024. "Determining the key performance indicators on game outcomes in NBA based on quantile regression analysis," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 519-534, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:24:y:2024:i:6:p:519-534
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2024.2325846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2024.2325846
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2024.2325846?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:24:y:2024:i:6:p:519-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.