IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v21y2021i1p12-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of racetrack surface on glycolytic activity of trained endurance horses

Author

Listed:
  • Paulo Moreira Bogossian
  • Paula Alessandra Di Filippo
  • Carlos Rafaell Correia-Oliveira

Abstract

No study has analysed the effects of wet and dry racetrack surface on the glycolytic activity of Arabian horses. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of wet and dry racetrack surfaces during a riding test in an Arabian endurance horse. Using a counterbalanced design, nine healthy and trained mixed-bred Arabian horses performed a single-step riding test on a wet (compacted sand) or dry (uncompacted sand) racetrack surface. The wet racetrack received a daily wetting and was compacted using a tractor, while the dry racetrack was upturned by a tractor daily. Both racetracks were elliptical with straight lines of 600 m and total length around 900 metres. Blood samples were drawn from the jugular vein, immediately after the end of the test, and used for the analysis of blood lactate concentration. Mean blood lactate concentration was significantly higher after the riding test on the dry racetrack (2.6 ± 1.6 mmol/L) compared with wet racetrack (0.9 ± 0.3 mmol/L) surface (p = 0.007; d = 1.48, [large]; 95%CI = 0.37–2.44). In conclusion, dry racetrack surface increases lactic anaerobic contribution in trained Arabian horses during a single-step riding test in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulo Moreira Bogossian & Paula Alessandra Di Filippo & Carlos Rafaell Correia-Oliveira, 2021. "Effect of racetrack surface on glycolytic activity of trained endurance horses," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 12-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:12-21
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2020.1842625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2020.1842625
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2020.1842625?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:12-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.