Author
Listed:
- Joaquín Sánchez-Moreno
- José Afonso
- Isabel Mesquita
- Aurelio Ureña
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to verify whether work-to-rest ratios in high-level sport exhibit evidence for self-regulation. Specifically, we analysed the relationship between rally length and rest times between rallies in high-level men’s volleyball. Ninety-five matches from five of the premier worldwide competitions were analysed (16,436 rallies). The average of rallies per set was 45.23±6.15 (rally length: 4.99±4.35 seconds; rest time: 29.02±19.44 seconds; work-to-rest ratio 1:5.81±.17 seconds). The distribution of rally length clusters was: short 74%, medium 14.38% and long 11.62%; and rest time clusters: short 81.71%, medium 10.83% and long 7.46%. Rest time between rallies seemed to increase when the rally was longer (τ =.214; p <.001), the set progressed (set period) (τ =.093; p <.001), the game progressed (set number) (τ =.209; p <.001), and when the intensity of the set was higher (set competitive load) (τ =.118; p <.001). Results provided original, detailed and recent evidence supporting self-regulated phenomena with respect to work-to-rest ratio in high-level sport, while also providing time-related volleyball-specific relevant information. The stochastic profile of game was established by self-regulated work-to-rest time ratios, in spite of the deterministic and cyclical characteristics of the game. Clusters of distributions of work-to-rest ratio allow for random series to be designed in order to inform specific training sessions according to the type of match, set number and set period. Moreover, it is suggested that the temporal peculiarities of volleyball promote pacing strategies when the ball is not in play.
Suggested Citation
Joaquín Sánchez-Moreno & José Afonso & Isabel Mesquita & Aurelio Ureña, 2016.
"Dynamics between playing activities and rest time in high-level men’s volleyball,"
International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 317-331, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:16:y:2016:i:1:p:317-331
DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2016.11868889
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:16:y:2016:i:1:p:317-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.