IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v16y2016i1p290-304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seasonal Variations in the Winning Scores of Matches in the Sevens World Series

Author

Listed:
  • K. Michele van Rooyen

Abstract

Sevens rugby has evolved considerably over recent years. There is plenty of information showing how the sport has grown across the globe. However, data pertaining to how the game itself has developed is scarce. This study aimed to document how points scored and conceded by winning teams varied over time in the Sevens World Series. Winning teams scored fewer points from 2006/2007 onwards for pool (pre, 31±1.6 vs. 26±2.1 post) and knockout (pre, 25±1.4 vs. 23±1.1 post) matches. Points conceded increased from 2008/2009 for knockout matches (pre 10±1.4 vs. 12±0.7 post). Categorizing teams according to pool position revealed that the drop in points scored by Cup teams was greater than that of Bowl teams (8pts vs. 5pts respectively) during pool matches. The increase in points conceded occurred during knockout matches involving Bowl teams. Subgroups for points scored were ascribed to specific changes in tournament structures and declines in performance of successful teams, whereas the increase in points conceded coincided with teams adopting a more professional approach to the sport. These factors with additional financial investment have seen the Sevens World Series successfully transition to a professional sport that has an immense following worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • K. Michele van Rooyen, 2016. "Seasonal Variations in the Winning Scores of Matches in the Sevens World Series," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 290-304, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:16:y:2016:i:1:p:290-304
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2016.11868887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2016.11868887
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2016.11868887?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:16:y:2016:i:1:p:290-304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.