Author
Listed:
- M. Jose Saavedra
- Yolanda Escalante
- Mirella Mansilla
- Victor Tella
- Joaquin Madera
- Antonio García-Hermoso
Abstract
The aims of this study were: (i) to compare water polo game-related statistics by context (winning and losing teams) and final score differences (using three categories – “close” games, “unbalanced” games, and “very unbalanced” games); and (ii) to identify characteristics that mark the differences in performances for each of these three categories of final score differences. The game-related statistics of the 213 women’s matches played in seven international championships were analysed. Differences between contexts (winning or losing teams) and final score differences (close, unbalanced, and very unbalanced games) were determined using the chi-squared statistic, also calculating the effect sizes of the differences. A discriminant analysis was then performed applying the sample-splitting method according to context in each final score. It was found that the game-related statistics differentiate the winning from the losing teams in each final score group, with one variable (penalty goals) differentiating winners from losers in close games, 12 in unbalanced games, and 13 (both offensive and defensive variables) in very unbalanced games. In all three types of game, the game-related statistics were shown to discriminate performance (82% or more), with three variables being discriminatory by context (winning or losing teams): goals, offensive fouls, and goalkeeper-blocked shots.
Suggested Citation
M. Jose Saavedra & Yolanda Escalante & Mirella Mansilla & Victor Tella & Joaquin Madera & Antonio García-Hermoso, 2016.
"Water polo game-related statistics in women’s international championships as a function of final score differences,"
International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 276-289, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:16:y:2016:i:1:p:276-289
DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2016.11868886
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:16:y:2016:i:1:p:276-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.