IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v15y2015i1p53-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Throwing Technique and Efficiency in the 2013 British Judo Championships

Author

Listed:
  • Glenn A Miller
  • Natasha A Collins
  • Michael J Stewart
  • Darren G Challis

Abstract

In order to quantify the use of technical throwing techniques in British Judo, the 2013 Junior and Senior British Championships were subject to analysis. 292 competitors of differing age and gender, competing in 558 contests under the 2010 – 2012 IJF rules, were analysed using SportsCode Pro software and publically available video footage. The overall aim was to develop a technical profile for standing techniques in British Judo, looking primarily at technique type and throw efficiency. The data exemplified that British judoka most effectively use foot techniques (ashi-waza) to obtain scores, with uchi-mata (inner thigh throw) proving to be the most efficient technique in the British repertoire. Males and females, juniors and seniors execute differing techniques; however only junior males provided data that didn’t match the overall trend, with te-waza (hand throws) and seoi-nage (shoulder throw) being the highest scoring and most efficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Glenn A Miller & Natasha A Collins & Michael J Stewart & Darren G Challis, 2015. "Throwing Technique and Efficiency in the 2013 British Judo Championships," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 53-68, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:15:y:2015:i:1:p:53-68
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2015.11868776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2015.11868776
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2015.11868776?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:15:y:2015:i:1:p:53-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.