IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v14y2014i3p894-906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The coach’s perception of the performance of game actions in training sessions. A case study in volleyball

Author

Listed:
  • P. Manzanares
  • J. M. Palao
  • E. Ortega

Abstract

Monitoring training sessions is a key aspect for team sports. This study presents and applies a tool for improving the coach’s qualitative analysis of the technical and tactical content. The goal of this study was to compare the coach’s subjective evaluation of players’ actions in training with the objective evaluation. The tool was applied to analyse two complete weeks of training of the competitive phase (including matches) of a volleyball team from the Spanish men’s first division. The study’s variables included: a) type of task, b) type of technical action carried out in the task, c) degree of fulfilment of the objectives in the exercises, d) coach’s perception, and e) degree of agreement between what is perceived and what is actually carried out. A descriptive and inferential analysis of the data was done. In this sample, the differences between the subjective perception of the coach and the objective recording of the efficacy demonstrate the need for training processes to be constantly monitored and the need for a specific plan for observing and analysing the training processes to increase the quality of the work that is carried out. The benefits, limitations, and usability of the tool are reviewed in the article.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Manzanares & J. M. Palao & E. Ortega, 2014. "The coach’s perception of the performance of game actions in training sessions. A case study in volleyball," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 894-906, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:14:y:2014:i:3:p:894-906
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2014.11868766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2014.11868766
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2014.11868766?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:14:y:2014:i:3:p:894-906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.