IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v14y2014i1p217-224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combat stance in judo – Laterality differences between and within competition levels

Author

Listed:
  • Julian Tirp
  • Joseph Baker
  • Matthias Weigelt
  • Jörg Schorer

Abstract

This study examined the impact of lateral preferences (i.e. left-dominant vs. right-dominant fighting stance) on success at different levels of judo competition (German University Championships vs. German Championships vs. Olympic Games). The lateralization of the fighting stance of 840 male judoka (Olympic Games n = 204, German Championships n = 203, & German University Championships n = 433) were compared. First, a comparison of high ranked versus a normative sample was conducted. Second, statistical analyses examined the relative impact of a left-dominant vs. right-dominant fighting stance between and within competition levels. Left dominant judoka from all tournaments ranked 1st-5th were over-represented compared to athletes who ranked 7th or worse at the German University Championship. Lateral differences in fighting stance also differentiated the tournament levels, with the highest percentage of judoka fighting with a left-dominant stance at the Olympic Games. Surprisingly, there were more left dominant judoka at the German University Championship in comparison to the more competitive German Championships. No interaction between fighting stance and rankings was revealed. Lateral differences have performance implications in competitive judo; the impact of a left-dominant fighting stance on competitive success differs within and between competition levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Julian Tirp & Joseph Baker & Matthias Weigelt & Jörg Schorer, 2014. "Combat stance in judo – Laterality differences between and within competition levels," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 217-224, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:14:y:2014:i:1:p:217-224
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2014.11868716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2014.11868716
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2014.11868716?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:14:y:2014:i:1:p:217-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.