IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v13y2013i3p860-871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to attack the service: an empirical contribution to rally opening in world-class badminton doubles

Author

Listed:
  • Wolf Gawin
  • Chris Beyer
  • Holger Hasse
  • Dirk Büsch

Abstract

The start of a rally is of particular importance in the doubles disciplines, as the receiving double may take the initiative in the rally with an aggressive return. To do so, the shuttlecock must be reached quickly and hit close to and high up at the net. Within these parameters it is likely that internationally successful top players are superior to less successful players. To provide evidence of this, the return by 10 female and 12 male doubles players was examined during an international tournament and the two parameters of time difference between service and return and the horizontal distance of the shuttlecock from the net at the point of contact were determined. It is argued that successful top players reach the shuttlecock faster and closer to the net than less successful players. With qualitative analyses the aim is to identify more effective movement techniques for the return. Differences between successful and less successful players in terms of these parameters can be detected in men but not in women. Players who are excellent at taking serve launch explosively with both legs, and accelerate the racket forwards by stretching the striking arm in a straight line to the shuttlecock.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolf Gawin & Chris Beyer & Holger Hasse & Dirk Büsch, 2013. "How to attack the service: an empirical contribution to rally opening in world-class badminton doubles," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 860-871, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:13:y:2013:i:3:p:860-871
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2013.11868694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2013.11868694
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2013.11868694?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:13:y:2013:i:3:p:860-871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.