IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v13y2013i1p1-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Video-based training combined with flotation tank recovery does not improve three-point shooting in basketball

Author

Listed:
  • J. Markus Klusemann
  • Jonathon Headrick
  • K. Christos Argus
  • B. David Pyne
  • D. Adam Gorman
  • J. Eric Drinkwater

Abstract

Video-based training combined with flotation tank recovery may provide an additional stimulus for improving shooting in basketball. A pre-post controlled trial was conducted to assess the effectiveness of a 3 wk intervention combining video-based training and flotation tank recovery on three-point shooting performance in elite female basketball players. Players were assigned to an experimental (n=10) and control group (n=9). A 3 wk intervention consisted of 2 x 30 min float sessions a week which included 10 min of video-based training footage, followed by a 3 wk retention phase. A total of 100 three-point shots were taken from 5 designated positions on the court at each week to assess three-point shooting performance. There was no clear difference in the mean change in the number of successful three-point shots between the groups (-3%; ±18%, mean; ±90% confidence limits). Video-based training combined with flotation recovery had little effect on three-point shooting performance.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Markus Klusemann & Jonathon Headrick & K. Christos Argus & B. David Pyne & D. Adam Gorman & J. Eric Drinkwater, 2013. "Video-based training combined with flotation tank recovery does not improve three-point shooting in basketball," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:13:y:2013:i:1:p:1-10
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2013.11868627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2013.11868627
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2013.11868627?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:13:y:2013:i:1:p:1-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.