IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rmobxx/v9y2014i2p188-219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Criticising the Solitary Mobile Subject: Researching Relational Mobilities and Reflecting on Mobile Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Katharina Manderscheid

Abstract

One of the key arguments of the mobilities paradigm is that people's mobility practices are embedded in their spatial, cultural, political, economical, social and personal context. Yet, empirical mobility research tends to research these two sides of the social separately - either mobility practices and their subjective sense and experience or their discursive, spatial or structural foundation. Taking this desideratum as point of departure, I will make a proposal for researching the links between structures and practices of mobilities consisting of the application of multiple correspondence analysis. This proposal attempts, furthermore, to operationalise mobilities as relational practices, which reinforces that social networks rather than solitary subjects are the origin of mobility decisions. This methodological approach is demonstrated by a comparative data analysis of movement patterns in England and Switzerland. In the final part of the paper, I will reflect upon methods and quantification more generally - against the background of an understanding of mobilities research as being also critical and political.

Suggested Citation

  • Katharina Manderscheid, 2014. "Criticising the Solitary Mobile Subject: Researching Relational Mobilities and Reflecting on Mobile Methods," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 188-219, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rmobxx:v:9:y:2014:i:2:p:188-219
    DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2013.830406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17450101.2013.830406
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17450101.2013.830406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Camilleri, Rosalie & Attard, Maria & Hickman, Robin, 2022. "Understanding barriers to modal shift in Malta: A practice-theoretical perspective of everyday mobility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Luis Camarero & Renato Miguel Carmo & Sofía Santos, 2020. "Condiciones ambientales y diferenciación social en los patrones de movilidad: el caso de las desigualdades de género en el Área Metropolitana de Lisboa," Revista de Estudios Regionales, Universidades Públicas de Andalucía, vol. 0(y), pages 145-172.
    3. Sattlegger, Lukas & Rau, Henrike, 2016. "Carlessness in a car‐centric world: A reconstructive approach to qualitative mobility biographies research," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 22-31.
    4. Sersli, Stephanie & Gislason, Maya & Scott, Nicholas & Winters, Meghan, 2020. "Riding alone and together: Is mobility of care at odds with mothers' bicycling?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. Schad, Helmut, 2020. "Unterwegssein in Transferräumen und Zwischenwelten," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Danielzyk, Rainer & Dittrich-Wesbuer, Andrea & Hilti, Nicola & Tippel, Cornelia (ed.), Multilokale Lebensführungen und räumliche Entwicklungen: ein Kompendium, volume 13, pages 203-208, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    6. van Dülmen, Christoph & Šimon, Martin & Klärner, Andreas, 2022. "Transport poverty meets car dependency: A GPS tracking study of socially disadvantaged groups in European rural peripheries," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    7. Dave Cook, 2020. "The freedom trap: digital nomads and the use of disciplining practices to manage work/leisure boundaries," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 355-390, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rmobxx:v:9:y:2014:i:2:p:188-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rmob20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.