IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rmdjxx/v16y2024i1p1-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Oil dependency and happiness in net oil-exporting countries: is it a curse or blessing?

Author

Listed:
  • Ly Slesman

Abstract

The resource curse hypothesis postulates that countries endowed with and dependent on abundant natural resources tend to underperform in socioeconomic and development outcomes than those with fewer natural resources. Recently, a few studies argued that this curse also manifests in lower life satisfaction or happiness. Focusing on 31 net oil-exporting countries over the 2006–2019 period, we find no evidence that oil rents (and aggregate and disaggregate resource rents) have an adverse effect on happiness or subjective well-being. This contrasts with recent studies using a global sample. We further contribute to this debate by examining the channels of resource curse or blessing along with income, unemployment, inflation, levels of human development, and governance. We show that oil rent enhances the positive marginal effects of income on happiness. We find no evidence of this conditional effect through other channels. Being rich in oil or natural resources is not necessarily a curse on happiness, but, if any, it is a blessing through income-generating well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Ly Slesman, 2024. "Oil dependency and happiness in net oil-exporting countries: is it a curse or blessing?," Middle East Development Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rmdjxx:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:1-26
    DOI: 10.1080/17938120.2023.2275484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17938120.2023.2275484
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17938120.2023.2275484?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rmdjxx:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:1-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rmdj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.