Author
Abstract
Lot meadows are those hay meadows that, periodically, are divided into plots which are allocated by raffle among the inhabitants of a township or a parish, usually integrated within a common field system. In this article the lot meadow is presented as a relevant object of study, which can facilitate the understanding of the origin and evolution of agricultural landscapes. Firstly, the article provides technical aspects on how the lot meadows operate in Cantabria, a region located in northern Spain. In this region two lot meadows are still in use, and many others remained in use until the mid-twentieth century. By interviewing and by direct observation, a feature about the way in which they are internally zoned was documented: a permanent division of the meadow into large sets of similar forage quality, each of them being the subject of a separate lottery. Secondly, a locational analysis of twentyseven lot meadows, based on environmental factors and using historical records from the seventeenth to nineteenth centuries, enabled the identification of possible causes of privatisation or the preference for private meadowlands. The entire analysis led to an illustration of two classic explanations about scattered holdings in common field systems: i.e. equality distribution, and risk avoidance. If a lot meadow was consensually privatised among the villagers, it is likely that such internal zoning in sets was maintained, and therefore scattered plots were obtained. Likewise, this tenure pattern would result if this allocation procedure (with internal zoning in sets) were used to collectively create private meadows or arable fields.1
Suggested Citation
Iago Vázquez, 2020.
"Lot meadows, do they have a role in understanding scattered holdings? A study case in northern Spain,"
Landscape History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 71-88, July.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:41:y:2020:i:2:p:71-88
DOI: 10.1080/01433768.2020.1835185
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:41:y:2020:i:2:p:71-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rlsh20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.