IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rlshxx/v39y2018i1p87-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Churchyards and cemeteries throughout the centuries — praxis and legislation

Author

Listed:
  • Grete Swensen
  • Jan Brendalsmo

Abstract

Cemeteries belong to spaces where a clear-cut division between public and private property is debatable. In Norway today such sites are formally considered public spaces — free to access all year round and open for all citizens independent of economic status and social belonging. In a longer time perspective both accessibility and property rights related to cemeteries have changed fundamentally. This article examines the laws and regulations which have influenced the ownership rights to cemeteries based on a close-up examination of historic documents. Concerning the burial practice in Norway, a floating border exists between private–public spaces which has been apparent since far back in time. In essence, churches and cemeteries in Norway have alternated between being privately owned or owned by the public, but this has not been decisive for people's use of the cemetery. Until approximately 1900 these areas served two purposes: on one side, burial of dead people and, on the other, to serve as a place for socially conditioned activity. Today's use, as it is described through stories told by people at the two cemeteries in question, shows that for many users these sites are still perceived as a kind of in-between area of the private–public realm. In the future the management of urban cemeteries has to balance the different demands put on such sites. This includes upholding their character as memory sites as well as ensuring that they can accommodate the new requirements of an increasingly culturally diverse urban population.

Suggested Citation

  • Grete Swensen & Jan Brendalsmo, 2018. "Churchyards and cemeteries throughout the centuries — praxis and legislation," Landscape History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 87-102, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:39:y:2018:i:1:p:87-102
    DOI: 10.1080/01433768.2018.1466551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01433768.2018.1466551
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01433768.2018.1466551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:39:y:2018:i:1:p:87-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rlsh20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.