Author
Abstract
The landscape of the private Old or East Cemetery in Reading was laid out as a garden, a plan popular in the early nineteenth century. Interments began in 1843 and continued after extension of the Cemetery in about 1900; in 1927 the rate of burials peaked in excess of 500 per decade. Although the town continued to grow, the interment rate subsequently plunged, in the face of competition from a new, municipal burial ground (Henley Road) in the eastern town. Burials continued at the Old Cemetery, but largely at established family plots. The Old Cemetery is now semi-wild, but in excess of 5,600 graves with accessible monuments are still to be found. The geological landscape presented by these memorials resembles that of other burial grounds in south-central and south-east England: chiefly Italian marble, Pennant sandstone, Scottish and Cornubian (Cornwall-Devon) granites, Portland limestone, and gabbro. There are minor applications of other granites, Lower Carboniferous Limestone, York stone, Banbury Ironstone, Bathstone, slate and gneiss, and some artificial stone (especially terrazzo) and cast iron. Pennant sandstone was the early stone of choice. Marble rose to great and sustained popularity from the late nineteenth century. Scottish granites had a modest but steady appeal, in contrast to granites from south-west England, which rose to prominence only in the early twentieth century. Gabbros from far overseas appeared mainly late, stimulated by the growth of cheap freight-container transport. The geological evolution of the landscape of the Old Cemetery therefore broadly matches that recorded in other burial grounds of the region, such as Oxford and west London.
Suggested Citation
J. R. L. Allen, 2018.
"Reading's Old or East Cemetery: the geological landscape of an urban burial ground in modern central Berkshire,"
Landscape History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 71-86, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:39:y:2018:i:1:p:71-86
DOI: 10.1080/01433768.2018.1466558
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:39:y:2018:i:1:p:71-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rlsh20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.