IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rlshxx/v34y2013i2p5-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Rome's ecological contribution to British flora and fauna: landscape, legacy and identity

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Witcher

Abstract

This paper addresses the flora and fauna of Roman Britain via two long-lived and closely-related notions: the 'Roman introduction' and the 'living legacy'. These concepts connect knowledge and beliefs about the introduction of new species during the Roman period with the idea of direct and enduring biological inheritance in post-Roman societies. The paper explores both the popular and academic prominence of the Romans as agents of ecological change with effects on landscape, identity and diet which are still discernible and resonant today. These notions demonstrate wide currency, from popular stories through to scientific research.Today, archaeobotany and zooarchaeology are the primary means of documenting the flora and fauna of Roman Britain. Yet the discipline of archaeology came late to this topic. This paper outlines the evolving sources of evidence used over the past 400 years to identify those species introduced during the Roman period. This includes consideration of the reception of classical texts, linguistic etymology and genetic analysis. An overarching narrative behind these concepts is the colonial theoretical framework of 'Romanisation', or the genealogical appropriation of the Romans as 'our' cultural and biological ancestors.Despite interest in the reception of Rome and its archaeological remains, scholars have been slow to recognise the centrality of flora and fauna for understanding historical and contemporary perceptions of the Roman past. This paper opens a new avenue of research by calling attention to the intellectual biography of the dominant interpretive frameworks which structure both scientific approaches to the collection and interpretation of data and popular attitudes towards landscape and identity.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Witcher, 2013. "On Rome's ecological contribution to British flora and fauna: landscape, legacy and identity," Landscape History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 5-26, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:34:y:2013:i:2:p:5-26
    DOI: 10.1080/01433768.2013.855393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01433768.2013.855393
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01433768.2013.855393?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thirsk, Joan, 1997. "Alternative Agriculture: A History: From the Black Death to the Present Day," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198206620.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Debeljak, Marko & Squire, Geoff R. & Demšar, Damjan & Young, Mark W. & Džeroski, Sašo, 2008. "Relations between the oilseed rape volunteer seedbank, and soil factors, weed functional groups and geographical location in the UK," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 138-146.
    2. David Stead, 2004. "Risk and risk management in English agriculture, c. 1750–1850," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 57(2), pages 334-361, May.
    3. Fraser, Evan D.G., 2011. "Can economic, land use and climatic stresses lead to famine, disease, warfare and death? Using Europe's calamitous 14th century as a parable for the modern age," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(7), pages 1269-1279, May.
    4. Hans Renes, 2010. "Grainlands. The landscape of open fields in a European perspective," Landscape History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 37-70, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:34:y:2013:i:2:p:5-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rlsh20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.