IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rlshxx/v34y2013i1p81-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural landscapes between the East Fen and the Tofts in south-east Lincolnshire 1100-1550

Author

Listed:
  • I. G. Simmons

Abstract

Historical work has tended to lump together the different types of terrain in lowland Lincolnshire. This paper looks at the landscape subregions between the southern end of the Lincolnshire Marsh and the village of Wrangle and examines the history of one of them in more detail. Sources of evidence include documents, aerial photographs, LiDAR, modern maps and knowledge of the terrain. The picture in medieval and early modern times was one of greater landscape diversity, many differences having been lost by drainage since the nineteenth century. The emerging picture for the area between the raised silts known as the Tofts and the East Fen (known as the Low Grounds and Commons) is one in which there was a mixture of terrain types, in which dry ground was devoted to arable and pasture but alongside which wetland remnants of peat moss, abandoned turbary and reed-beds persisted. There is also evidence that salt was made at one stage in the landscape's evolution, with the probability that this was an early medieval stage. Although now effectively drained, the field boundaries are still mostly ditches and are an element of continuity from earlier times in a landscape for long defined by the presence of water.

Suggested Citation

  • I. G. Simmons, 2013. "Rural landscapes between the East Fen and the Tofts in south-east Lincolnshire 1100-1550," Landscape History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 81-90, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:34:y:2013:i:1:p:81-90
    DOI: 10.1080/01433768.2013.797200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01433768.2013.797200
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01433768.2013.797200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:34:y:2013:i:1:p:81-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rlsh20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.