IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rlshxx/v31y2010i1p37-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hushes, delfs and river stonary: alternative methods of obtaining lime in the gritstone Pennines in the early modern period

Author

Listed:
  • David Johnson

Abstract

The production of burnt lime in regions with outcrops of limestone is well documented but lime was also produced on a proto-industrial scale along the northern edges of the South Pennines where sandstone and gritstone constitute the dominant solid geology. Demand for lime led to the development of alternative ways of obtaining raw limestone locally. Along the moorland edge, water was channelled to flush limestone cobbles out of glacial deposits by hushing; cobbles were dug from limestone boulder pits on the moors north and south of Airedale and Wharfedale; and rights to pick limestone cobbles from within river channels were leased as river stonary along the Wharfe and smaller streams. These practices have been identified from the medieval period to the end of the eighteenth century.

Suggested Citation

  • David Johnson, 2010. "Hushes, delfs and river stonary: alternative methods of obtaining lime in the gritstone Pennines in the early modern period," Landscape History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 37-52, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:31:y:2010:i:1:p:37-52
    DOI: 10.1080/01433768.2010.10594614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01433768.2010.10594614
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01433768.2010.10594614?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:31:y:2010:i:1:p:37-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rlsh20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.