IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rlshxx/v31y2010i1p23-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable environments: common wood pastures in Norfolk

Author

Listed:
  • Patsy Dallas

Abstract

The following paper examines the management and sustainability of wood pasture on the commons of Norfolk from the medieval period until the early nineteenth century. It has been generally accepted that areas of common wood pasture were particularly unstable environments, subject to overgrazing and tree removal with little means of maintaining the dual resources of pasture and wood. However, evidence from the populous and intensively farmed county of Norfolk challenges that assertion. Using sources including manorial records, manuscript maps and the documentation associated with Parliamentary Enclosure this paper demonstrates that individual tenants and groups of commoners defended their right to use and maintain wooded common pastures. Manorial records defined customary rights to manage existing pollards and for the regular planting of young trees on commons. Peasant farmers continued to exercise these rights throughout the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and, when challenged, took their grievances to the law courts, making full use of the contemporary judicial system. The evidence from Norfolk suggests that wood pastures were managed and replenished by those with common rights, who sustained this resource despite opposition and the potential for overuse. Only when the commons themselves succumbed to Enclosure in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century did common wood pasture cease to be a customary part of the Norfolk landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Patsy Dallas, 2010. "Sustainable environments: common wood pastures in Norfolk," Landscape History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 23-36, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:31:y:2010:i:1:p:23-36
    DOI: 10.1080/01433768.2010.10594613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01433768.2010.10594613
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01433768.2010.10594613?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuping Huang & Cecil Konijnendijk van den Bosch & Weicong Fu & Jinda Qi & Ziru Chen & Zhipeng Zhu & Jianwen Dong, 2018. "Does Adding Local Tree Elements into Dwellings Enhance Individuals’ Homesickness? Scenario-Visualisation for Developing Sustainable Rural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:31:y:2010:i:1:p:23-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rlsh20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.