Author
Listed:
- Steven Jige Quan
- Seojung Lee
Abstract
Recent advancements in technology for planning support have led to increased interest in participatory planning support systems (PPSSs). However, existing PPSSs often struggle to facilitate higher levels of public participation due to limitations in their practical usefulness. Emerging large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, along with artificial intelligence (AI) technologies such as deep generative methods, offer new opportunities to enhance PPSS, though this potential has yet to be fully explored. This study aims to address these gaps by integrating LLMs, specifically ChatGPT, into a new web-based PPSS platform. The platform operates as a multi-agent system with five key components: users, process, agents, knowledge, and tools. Stakeholders engage with ChatGPT-enabled personalized agents that are supported by a project-specific knowledge base. These agents understand user preferences, concerns, and needs, and call upon task agents, also powered by ChatGPT, to execute tasks, including applying deep generative tools that enable stakeholders to create their own designs. A workflow agent coordinates the overall process, facilitating the sharing of information, data, opinions, and designs to promote communication and build consensus among stakeholders. The platform was tested in a hypothetical sustainable urban regeneration case, the New Seollo Project in Seoul. Compared to the actual Seoullo project, which faced substantial criticism, the simulated results suggest the platform’s potential to significantly improve participation and generate better design solutions. This new PPSS platform enhances usefulness by improving stakeholder communication and empowering the public to contribute comprehensive, inclusive, and creative solutions for sustainable urban development.
Suggested Citation
Steven Jige Quan & Seojung Lee, 2025.
"Enhancing participatory planning with ChatGPT-assisted planning support systems: a hypothetical case study in Seoul,"
International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 89-122, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rjusxx:v:29:y:2025:i:1:p:89-122
DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2025.2462823
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjusxx:v:29:y:2025:i:1:p:89-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjus20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.