Author
Listed:
- Ranjith Dissanayake
- Chaminda S. Bandara
Abstract
Rehabilitation of damaged bridges may be more beneficial than building new bridges. However, proper methods are necessary to assess the level of damages and to verify the fitness of such bridges for further use. In the assessment, there are two important criteria to consider. One is the amount of damage due to fatigue caused by usual past vehicle loading and the other is the magnitude of damage caused by the unexpected actions. The present paper is about a wrought iron bridge damaged by floods. In order to do the assessment, a condition survey was first carried out. Then an analysis was done using a finite element model of the bridge. The model was validated using results of a field loading test. Both static and dynamic loading tests were conducted using a locomotive with six numbers of 13.16-ton axles for five different loading cases to measure the displacement, strain and acceleration at predetermined (critical) members of the bridge. Then the damage in the bridge due to past loading histories and the future fatigue life of the bridge were estimated. Furthermore, using the validated model, the ability of the bridge for higher loading situations was confirmed. The future life was found as 30 years with a factor of safety of 3. The cost estimated for retrofitting work and constructing new reinforced concrete abutments was much less than that for constructing a new bridge. Therefore, it was decided that the rehabilitation of the bridge with necessary retrofitting work is more economical and sustainable than demolishing it and constructing a new one. The bridge is now in use after being repaired, retrofitted and placed on new abutments.
Suggested Citation
Ranjith Dissanayake & Chaminda S. Bandara, 2016.
"Retrofitting of damaged bridges -- the sustainable solution,"
International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(sup1), pages 50-59, July.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rjusxx:v:20:y:2016:i:sup1:p:50-59
DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2016.1138877
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjusxx:v:20:y:2016:i:sup1:p:50-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjus20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.