IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjrhxx/v32y2023i1p21-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Auction versus Private Negotiation in Residential Property Sales

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Huang
  • J. Reid Cummings
  • Ronald W. Spahr
  • Mark A. Sunderman

Abstract

The U.S. residential real estate market is unlike international markets of Australia, Singapore, and New Zealand, where public auctions are common or even preferred by property sellers, particularly for new homes. In these foreign markets, excess demand and supply shortages drive sale price premiums for auctioned properties. We use residential property sales for 2000-2017 from Montgomery, Alabama, to investigate latent differences between sale prices for properties selling at public auction versus sale prices resulting from privately negotiated transactions closed by real estate agents who report results to their regional multiple listing service. Of the residential properties in our sample, only 0.6 percent sold via auction, and there were no sales of newly constructed homes. Properties sold by auction demonstrate reduced information asymmetry and improved pricing accuracy; however, these properties tend to be in the lower price range, older, lower quality, previously on the market for a more significant amount of time, and those selling at lower prices. In addition to using other econometric methods, we incorporate a factor analysis, a method not often used in real estate research but well suited to our study. New homes sold via private negotiation show the highest orthogonal factor loading. At the same time, our demand and bank-owned property variables have higher factor loadings for publicly auctioned properties. Our conclusions persist even after removing foreclosed properties from the analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Huang & J. Reid Cummings & Ronald W. Spahr & Mark A. Sunderman, 2023. "Public Auction versus Private Negotiation in Residential Property Sales," Journal of Housing Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 21-40, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjrhxx:v:32:y:2023:i:1:p:21-40
    DOI: 10.1080/10527001.2022.2041343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10527001.2022.2041343
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10527001.2022.2041343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjrhxx:v:32:y:2023:i:1:p:21-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjrh20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.