Author
Listed:
- Leah Brooks
- Rachel Meltzer
Abstract
Problem, research strategy, and findingsThough demand for living near urban amenities has grown over the past two decades, retail vacancies continue to plague many urban areas. Are cities overzoning for retail? Can this overzoning explain the proliferation of urban retail vacancies in the past two decades? We first leveraged longitudinal data on retail leases to depict patterns of retail market activity in a sample of seven moderate to large U.S. cities. Second, we used property-level data on land use regulation to investigate whether institutional context, specifically zoning, has played a role in patterns of urban retail vacancy in the past two decades. We drilled down in New York City (NY) and Los Angeles (CA) to compare trends in retail leases with changes in regulated retail land use between 2006 and 2022. We show that in this period retail rents remained flat or declined and that the average retail space did not grow and may have shrunk. Our New York and Los Angeles microdata document that, during roughly this same period, the amount of land zoned for retail increased and that the building square footage zoned for retail grew even more rapidly. Indeed, during the same decades when retail leasing slowed and rents declined, the total amount of land and square footage regulated for retail use increased. Thus, our research indicates that, in addition to market forces, land use decisions have driven the current oversupply of retail space. This also suggests an important role for planning in solving the problem of vacancies.Takeaway for practiceIf macroeconomic factors drive the obsolescence of certain commercial uses, local zoning and comprehensive planning should respond accordingly. As cities emerge from the pandemic and adjust to new work–live patterns, planning for the volume and spatial distribution of retail will remain an important task for urban planners and managers.
Suggested Citation
Leah Brooks & Rachel Meltzer, 2025.
"Retail on the Ground and on the Books: Vacancies and the (Mis)Match Between Retail Activity and Regulated Land Uses,"
Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 91(2), pages 192-206, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:91:y:2025:i:2:p:192-206
DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2024.2373900
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:91:y:2025:i:2:p:192-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjpa20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.