Author
Abstract
Problem, research strategy, and findingsAlthough the physical health benefits of utilitarian bicycling are well documented, there is little empirical evidence to demonstrate the mental health benefits. We investigated a) the association between utilitarian bicycling behavior and mental wellbeing and b) the role of the built environment in promoting utilitarian bicycling and improving mental wellbeing. We used data from a large, representative survey (N = 30,105) conducted in Victoria (Australia) and applied a structural equation model (SEM) to explore the relationships between the built environment, utilitarian bicycling, and mental wellbeing. Overall, we found that utilitarian bicycling is positively associated with life satisfaction and negatively associated with psychological distress, and that these effects vary significantly by gender and age. We also found that highly bikeable neighborhoods are associated with better mental health, though this correlation is fully mediated by bicycling and walking behavior.Takeaway for practiceThese findings suggest that promoting utilitarian bicycling may help increase mental health and boost life satisfaction, particularly in women and older adults. Therefore, mental health should be addressed in the literature on the benefits of utilitarian biking. These findings also suggest that planning efforts to promote bicycling among women and older adults should focus not only on improving safety but also on providing infrastructure that enhances the psychological pleasure of bicycling. Finally, these findings suggest that a highly bikeable neighborhood is not just a healthy but a happy one.
Suggested Citation
Liang Ma & Runing Ye, 2022.
"Utilitarian Bicycling and Mental Wellbeing,"
Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 88(2), pages 262-276, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:88:y:2022:i:2:p:262-276
DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2021.1950036
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:88:y:2022:i:2:p:262-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjpa20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.