IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjpaxx/v82y2016i2p104-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making Historic Preservation Sustainable

Author

Listed:
  • Erica Avrami

Abstract

Problem, research strategy, and findings: Historic preservation has the potential to serve as a constructive agent of change within the built environment and to contribute to goals of environmental, economic, and social sustainability. However, tensions between sustainability goals and preservation policy and practice are impeding opportunities to forge common ground and a shared agenda. I review the existing literature related to the preservation---sustainability nexus and critically analyze how preservation policies and practices conflict with or support key sustainability goals of energy consumption reduction, alternative energy production, urban densification, economic development, inclusion, diversity and participation, and intergenerational equity. Key findings of this research include the need to resolve tensions between sustainability and historic preservation practice through research and data, evolving preservation policies, and aligning historic preservation with the goals of environmental, economic, and social sustainability. Takeaway for practice: The future of the preservation field and its engagement with sustainability goals hinge on the ability to contribute to environmental, economic, and social aims, but to also demonstrate why social concerns may sometimes trump economic and environmental ones given the fundamentally social aims of historic preservation. Understanding where tensions lie and why conflicts arise is an important step toward enhancing research about preservation outcomes and their contributions to sustainability and evolving preservation policy to better respond to changing environmental, economic, and societal conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Erica Avrami, 2016. "Making Historic Preservation Sustainable," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 82(2), pages 104-112, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:82:y:2016:i:2:p:104-112
    DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2015.1126196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01944363.2015.1126196
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01944363.2015.1126196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hannah M. Teicher, 2023. "Making embodied carbon mainstream: a framework for cities to leverage waste, equity, and preservation policy to reduce embodied emissions in buildings," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(3), pages 404-418, September.
    2. Tetsuharu Oba & Douglas Simpson Noonan, 2020. "The Price of Preserving Neighborhoods: The Unequal Impacts of Historic District Designation," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 34(4), pages 343-355, November.
    3. Maria Karoglou & Stella Sofia Kyvelou & Christos Boukouvalas & Chryssa Theofani & Asterios Bakolas & Magdalini Krokida & Antonia Moropoulou, 2019. "Towards a Preservation–Sustainability Nexus: Applying LCA to Reduce the Environmental Footprint of Modern Built Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Xiao Song & Kee-Cheok Cheong & Qianyi Wang & Yurui Li, 2020. "Developmental Sustainability through Heritage Preservation: Two Chinese Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Rachel Gallagher & Thomas Jason Sigler & Yan Liu, 2024. "Character contradiction: The exclusionary nature of preservationist planning restrictions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 1013-1030, May.
    6. Liu, Ruiming & Yan, Haosheng & Zhang, Zebang, 2024. "Does historic preservation affect firms' output? Evidence from the awarding of the Historic City title in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    7. Wendy Wuyts & Raphael Sedlitzky & Masato Morita & Hiroki Tanikawa, 2020. "Understanding and Managing Vacant Houses in Support of a Material Stock-Type Society—The Case of Kitakyushu, Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-23, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:82:y:2016:i:2:p:104-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjpa20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.