IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjpaxx/v78y2012i1p53-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Where the Jobs Are Going: Job Sprawl in U.S. Metropolitan Regions, 2001–2006

Author

Listed:
  • Jerry Weitz
  • Tom Crawford

Abstract

Problem: Employment is an underemphasized component of sprawl. A measure of job sprawl that accounts for the proximity of employment to populated places is needed to grasp problems of sprawl (especially those related to mobility) and mitigate their impacts. Prior sprawl studies have not investigated the proximity of jobs and populated places in ways that are replicable and meaningful to practitioners. Purpose: We seek to elevate the importance of employment generally and the proximity of jobs to populated places more specifically, in the sprawl debate. For 358 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) in the United States, we investigate how spatial patterns of job locations have changed from 2001 to 2006 in relation to preexisting (year 2000) populated places. We present results nationally and investigate whether urban containment regions (mostly in the west) and residentially sprawled metro areas in southern states performed better or worse than the mean for all MSAs with regard to the job sprawl metric. Methods: Using a GIS, we developed and applied a job sprawl metric that measured employment change over time (2001–2006) in relation to populated places in 2000, within and adjacent to 358 U.S. metropolitan areas. Job sprawl was defined as the percentage of change in job proximity (or straight-line distance, as a proxy for accessibility) to populated places over time. Results and conclusions: Of 358 metropolitan regions, 227 (63%) experienced job gain and a decrease in job accessibility, confirming the stereotypical pattern of job sprawl in growing regions. None of the nine selected urban containment regions increased proximity of jobs to populated places from 2001 to 2006 (i.e., they still exhibited job sprawl). Mixed results were observed for 11 regions characterized as having low-density residential sprawl as of 2000. Takeaway for practice: Measuring job sprawl as decreasing accessibility among jobs and populated places over time gives practitioners a better understanding of the resulting spatial and functional relationships among land uses in the region. Urban containment alone appears to be insufficient to avoid mobility-related problems. Sprawl studies must be made more relevant to practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerry Weitz & Tom Crawford, 2012. "Where the Jobs Are Going: Job Sprawl in U.S. Metropolitan Regions, 2001–2006," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(1), pages 53-69.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:78:y:2012:i:1:p:53-69
    DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2011.645276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01944363.2011.645276
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01944363.2011.645276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fang Wei & Paul L Knox, 2015. "Spatial Transformation of Metropolitan Cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(1), pages 50-68, January.
    2. Pierre Filion, 2018. "Enduring Features of the North American Suburb: Built Form, Automobile Orientation, Suburban Culture and Political Mobilization," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 4-14.
    3. Merlin, Louis A., 2018. "The influence of infill development on travel behavior," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 54-67.
    4. Ilan Salomon & Matan E. Singer, 2014. "'Informal Travel': A New Conceptualization of Travel Patterns?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 562-582, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:78:y:2012:i:1:p:53-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjpa20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.