IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjouxx/v18y2025i1p112-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban policy transfer and paradigm shift: the City of Sydney Strategic Plan 1971

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Freestone
  • Sarah Baker

Abstract

Into the 1960s central area planning in Australian cities was a rudimentary exercise driven by two-dimensional zoning. Progressive planners lamented the lack of holistic, long-term, flexible thinking and inattention to place-making. American cities inserting more design sensibility into urban policy-making became touchstones for reform. This paper reveals the influence which US theory and practice had on the origins, ambitions, and even format of a landmark Australian city plan of the late twentieth century: the City of Sydney Strategic Plan 1971. The influence is framed through the lens of urban policy transfer. The American influence on chief consultant George Clarke and his team was notable as they reinvented the town planning paradigm based on legalistic controls into a more objectives-based, design-led, people-centered consultative approach. The plan was generally welcomed, albeit circumspectly by developers. Direct implementation was hampered by outdated statutory planning procedures but a benchmark for strategic urban planning was achieved.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Freestone & Sarah Baker, 2025. "Urban policy transfer and paradigm shift: the City of Sydney Strategic Plan 1971," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 112-131, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:112-131
    DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2022.2108115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17549175.2022.2108115
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17549175.2022.2108115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:112-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjou20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.