IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjouxx/v18y2025i1p1-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring child-friendly cities: developing and piloting an indicator assessment tool for sustainable neighborhood planning

Author

Listed:
  • Nelya Rakhimova
  • Devon McAslan
  • David Pijawka

Abstract

The need to develop cities that meet the needs of children is vital. As neighborhoods become more important to the goal of urban sustainability, they must consider the developmental needs of children by allowing them to independently access places, to socialize, and learn from the built environment. Existing assessment tools are less relevant to sprawling cities typical in the U.S. are overly complex, and lack a neighborhood focus. In this paper, we develop a child friendly neighborhood assessment tool for use by urban planners and policymakers. We conduct a small-scale pilot in four neighborhoods in Glendale, Arizona and find that each neighborhood is deficient in multiple dimensions. We then assess the performance and limitations of the assessment tool and suggest ways to improve it in future iterations. Lastly, we discuss how urban planners can utilize the tool and how it connects to policies for creating more child-friendly and sustainable neighborhoods.

Suggested Citation

  • Nelya Rakhimova & Devon McAslan & David Pijawka, 2025. "Measuring child-friendly cities: developing and piloting an indicator assessment tool for sustainable neighborhood planning," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 1-27, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:1-27
    DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2022.2111589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17549175.2022.2111589
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17549175.2022.2111589?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:1-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjou20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.