IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjouxx/v17y2024i4p577-595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review of planning policies for community wellbeing

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Alidoust
  • Nikita Gleeson
  • Fahimeh Khalaj

Abstract

With more than half of the world’s population living in cities, a growing body of research is showing the role of urban environments in promoting the wellbeing of communities. This paper conducted a systematic review of 28 planning policy documents from 6 different countries. It explored how ‘community wellbeing’ is defined by local governments across the world and identified thirteen domains. Findings indicated that the scope of understanding of community wellbeing varies across different local governments, particularly in relation to the type of council (metropolitan and non-metropolitan). The position of policy within the broader local government strategic direction and the context-specific opportunities and challenges of local communities were also important to the definition of community wellbeing. Only about half of the policies we reviewed employed community wellbeing indicators, which play an important role in the research-practice transition and developing evidence-informed policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Alidoust & Nikita Gleeson & Fahimeh Khalaj, 2024. "A systematic review of planning policies for community wellbeing," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 577-595, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:577-595
    DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2022.2071971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17549175.2022.2071971
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17549175.2022.2071971?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:577-595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjou20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.