IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjerxx/v47y2025i1p78-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agency Choice and Financial Consequences: Evidence from the Sydney Housing Market

Author

Listed:
  • Song Shi
  • Junji Xiao

Abstract

This paper studies the seller’s agency choice and the financial consequences of this decision. Specifically, at sale, sellers can choose to use either the same agency they originally purchased the house from, or a different agency. Since the same agency sold the property before, it has an informational advantage by knowing the property and principal. Using housing market transaction data in Sydney, the largest capital city in Australia, we show that sellers make their agency choice based on past purchase experience, non-salient features of the property, and the current market shares of the agency. Furthermore, our analysis of pair sale transactions reveals that using the same agency results in a 1.1–1.4% return discount compared to using a different agency. The findings support agency theory, which suggests that using the same agency may not be financially beneficial for the principals due to its informational advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • Song Shi & Junji Xiao, 2025. "Agency Choice and Financial Consequences: Evidence from the Sydney Housing Market," Journal of Real Estate Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 78-102, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:47:y:2025:i:1:p:78-102
    DOI: 10.1080/08965803.2023.2295136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08965803.2023.2295136
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08965803.2023.2295136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:47:y:2025:i:1:p:78-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.