IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjerxx/v45y2023i3p328-359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Commercial Real Estate Gendered?

Author

Listed:
  • Eren Cifci
  • Alan Tidwell
  • Sandra Mortal
  • Vishal K. Gupta

Abstract

Gender differences in labor market outcomes are well-documented and are expected to be more pronounced in male-typed domains such as commercial real estate. In this study, we expand the literature examining gender dynamics in the labor market, focusing specifically on gendered parity in commercial real estate brokerage. Employing robust procedures, we find that the unadjusted observed male agent property sales price premium and shorter marketing time are completely absorbed by property and market attributes as male agents list/sell properties with superior property characteristics, specifically larger and higher quality properties, when compared to female agents. The findings suggest that initial gendered differences in sales price and TOM are due to industry-driven agent selection, in which women do not fully participate in the largest and best part of the office market. Despite these findings showing gender performance neutrality, female agents are involved in significantly fewer property transactions than their male counterparts. We find evidence that this unequal labor outcome is associated with a type of affinity bias known as 'homophilic’ behavior, in which buyers and sellers prefer to work with agents of their same gender, resulting in more male agent representation.

Suggested Citation

  • Eren Cifci & Alan Tidwell & Sandra Mortal & Vishal K. Gupta, 2023. "Is Commercial Real Estate Gendered?," Journal of Real Estate Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 328-359, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:45:y:2023:i:3:p:328-359
    DOI: 10.1080/08965803.2022.2123592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08965803.2022.2123592
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08965803.2022.2123592?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:45:y:2023:i:3:p:328-359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.