IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjerxx/v44y2022i4p523-552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Portfolio Diversification Across U.S. Gateway and Non-Gateway Real Estate Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Hoesli
  • Louis Johner

Abstract

Using simulation analysis and property-level data for the US, we compare performance metrics for portfolios containing varying proportions of gateway and non-gateway markets. Risk-adjusted performance is found to be similar across types of markets. Gateway markets have higher appreciation and total returns, while non-gateway markets exhibit higher income returns even after accounting for capital expenditures. Downside risk appears to be slightly greater for gateway markets than for non-gateway markets; however, full drawdown and recovery lengths tend to be shorter for gateway markets. Systematic risk is found to be constant across types of markets. We show that discriminating between gateway and non-gateway markets is useful for mixed-asset diversification purposes, with the former type of markets appearing in risky portfolios and the latter in low-risk portfolios. By considering a large spectrum of performance metrics in a realistic investment setting, the results should provide investors with valuable information when allocating funds across gateway and non-gateway markets. The article also provides insights regarding how best to define gateway markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Hoesli & Louis Johner, 2022. "Portfolio Diversification Across U.S. Gateway and Non-Gateway Real Estate Markets," Journal of Real Estate Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 523-552, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:44:y:2022:i:4:p:523-552
    DOI: 10.1080/08965803.2022.2038902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08965803.2022.2038902
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08965803.2022.2038902?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:44:y:2022:i:4:p:523-552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.