IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjerxx/v43y2021i2p145-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Redefault Risk in the Aftermath of the Mortgage Crisis: Why Did Modifications Improve More than Self-Cures?

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Calem
  • Julapa Jagtiani
  • Raman Quinn Maingi

Abstract

This paper examines change in the redefault rate of delinquent mortgage borrowers granted a loan modification during the 2008–2011 period, in comparison to similarly situated self-cured borrowers. We document a larger decline in the redefault rate of modified relative to self-cured loans, controlling for differences in their observable characteristics using a propensity score matching process. We attribute the relatively rapid improvement in performance of the modified loans in part to an increasing share of principal-reduction modifications and to increasingly generous interest rate reductions. Even after accounting for these and other factors, we still observe a larger decline in the redefault rate for modifications. This higher success rate for later modification cohorts likely reflects servicer “learning-by-doing.” Overall, our findings are supportive of public policy that encourages mortgage modification, which has proved to be successful in allowing distressed homeowners to keep their homes and reducing losses to lending institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Calem & Julapa Jagtiani & Raman Quinn Maingi, 2021. "Redefault Risk in the Aftermath of the Mortgage Crisis: Why Did Modifications Improve More than Self-Cures?," Journal of Real Estate Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 145-180, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:43:y:2021:i:2:p:145-180
    DOI: 10.1080/08965803.2021.1925518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08965803.2021.1925518
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08965803.2021.1925518?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:43:y:2021:i:2:p:145-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.