IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjerxx/v40y2018i3p375-418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Artificial Neural Networks Training Algorithms on Accurate Prediction of Property Values

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Awoamim Yacim
  • Douw Gert Brand Boshoff

Abstract

This study extended the use of artificial neural networks (ANNs) training algorithms in mass appraisal. The goal was to verify the comparative performance of ANNs with linear, semi-log, and log-log models. The methods were applied to a dataset of 3,232 single-family dwellings sold in Cape Town, South Africa. The results reveal that the semi-log model and the Levenberg-Marquardt trained artificial neural networks (LMANNs) performed best in their respective categories. The best performing models were tested in terms of prediction accuracy within the 10% and 20% of the assessed values, performance, and reliability ranking, and explicit explainability ranking order. The LMANNs outperform the semi-log model in the first two tests, but fail the explainability ranking order test. The results demonstrate the semi-log model as the most preferred technique due to its simplicity, consistency, transparency, locational advantage, and ease of application within the mass appraisal environment. The black box nature of the ANNs inhibits the production of sufficiently transparent estimates that appraisers could use to explain the process in legal proceedings.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Awoamim Yacim & Douw Gert Brand Boshoff, 2018. "Impact of Artificial Neural Networks Training Algorithms on Accurate Prediction of Property Values," Journal of Real Estate Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 375-418, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:40:y:2018:i:3:p:375-418
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2018.12091505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2018.12091505
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2018.12091505?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:40:y:2018:i:3:p:375-418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.