IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjerxx/v37y2015i4p597-622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Benefit of Search in Housing Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Ping Cheng
  • Zhenguo Lin
  • Yingchun Liu
  • Michael J . Seiler

Abstract

Unlike in an efficient market where buyers and sellers are mere price-takers, participants in the real estate market are able to influence ultimate transaction prices through individual search efforts. Such benefit can offset the negative price trend of a declining market and compound the positive price trend of a growing market, suggesting an asymmetric effect of the price and time-on-the-market (TOM) relation. In other words, search mitigates the downside risk and magnifies the upside potential for the seller, which is an important advantage for real estate investors. In this study, we uncover the asymmetric price–TOM relation, and demonstrate the value of search using empirical data from the residential real estate market. Based on a large sample of home sales in the Virginia Beach–Norfolk, Virginia metropolitan area during an extended period of time, our findings clearly reveal an asymmetric search effect on price: longer TOM is strongly correlated with higher selling prices, but more interestingly, even in a declining market, the effect of the search (or the impact of TOM) on price is still positive, albeit smaller, suggesting the benefit of search is more than enough to potentially offset a negative market impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Ping Cheng & Zhenguo Lin & Yingchun Liu & Michael J . Seiler, 2015. "The Benefit of Search in Housing Markets," Journal of Real Estate Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 597-622, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:37:y:2015:i:4:p:597-622
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2015.12091430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2015.12091430
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2015.12091430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:37:y:2015:i:4:p:597-622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.