IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjerxx/v33y2011i4p443-470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heterogeneous Information and Appraisal Smoothing

Author

Listed:
  • Ping Cheng
  • Zhenguo Lin
  • Yingchun Liu

Abstract

This study examines the heterogeneous appraiser behavior and its implication on traditional appraisal smoothing theory. The findings demonstrate that the partial adjustment model is consistent with the traditional appraisal smoothing argument only when all appraisers choose the same smoothing technique. However, if appraiser behavior is heterogeneous and exhibits cross-sectional variation due to the difference in their access to, and interpretation of information, the model actually leads to a mixed outcome: The variance of the transaction-based returns can be higher or lower than the variance of comparable-based return depending on the degree of such heterogeneity. Contrary to what the traditional appraisal smoothing theory would predict, appraisal-based indices may not suffer any "smoothing" bias. These findings suggest that the traditional appraisal smoothing theory, which fails to consider the heterogeneity of appraiser behaviors, exaggerates the effect of appraisal smoothing.

Suggested Citation

  • Ping Cheng & Zhenguo Lin & Yingchun Liu, 2011. "Heterogeneous Information and Appraisal Smoothing," Journal of Real Estate Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 443-470, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:33:y:2011:i:4:p:443-470
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2011.12091314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2011.12091314
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2011.12091314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:33:y:2011:i:4:p:443-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.