IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjerxx/v25y2003i1p43-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing Home Quality, Chain Affiliation, Profit Status and Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Randy Anderson
  • H Weeks
  • Bradley Hobbs
  • James Webb

Abstract

This article is the winner of the Seniors Housing category (sponsored by the National Investment Council for Seniors Housing) awarded at the 2002 American Real Estate Society Annual Meeting.This study uses Florida nursing home data to examine several issues about the efficiency of nursing homes. Chain affiliation is examined as is profit status. For the first time quality of care is also included, due to the uniqueness of the data which contains quality scores. Without controlling for quality, for-profit firms and chain affiliated firms are shown to be slightly more efficient than their independent and non-profit counterparts. However, chain affiliated firms scored lower on quality than independents and for-profit firms scored lower on quality than non-profit firms. When controlling for quality, the profit status of the firm and room utilization rates are positively related to efficiency. However, in the presence of the quality control variable, there is not evidence to suggest that chain affiliation impacts efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Randy Anderson & H Weeks & Bradley Hobbs & James Webb, 2003. "Nursing Home Quality, Chain Affiliation, Profit Status and Performance," Journal of Real Estate Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 43-60, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:25:y:2003:i:1:p:43-60
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2003.12091100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2003.12091100
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2003.12091100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:25:y:2003:i:1:p:43-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.