IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjelxx/v32y2024i2p57-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do People Value Environmental Goods? Evidence From the Dutch Housing Market

Author

Listed:
  • Koen van Ruijven
  • Joep Tijm

Abstract

This article studies the relationship between environmental goods and housing prices in the Netherlands. Applying a hedonic pricing model, we estimate simultaneous correlations between housing prices and air quality, noise pollution, green scenery, and water scenery, demonstrating the importance of including related sets of environmental goods to avoid omitted variable bias. We find that households particularly value noise pollution and green and water amenities in close proximity to their house. Air quality does not appear to substantially impact housing prices, neither do green spaces located more than 200 meters away. These results suggests that households mainly value those environmental goods that are directly experienced. A comparison of our hedonic price results to existing monetary estimates of the health effects of environmental goods indicates that people only partially internalize these health effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Koen van Ruijven & Joep Tijm, 2024. "Do People Value Environmental Goods? Evidence From the Dutch Housing Market," Journal of Real Estate Literature, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 57-102, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjelxx:v:32:y:2024:i:2:p:57-102
    DOI: 10.1080/09277544.2024.2322781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09277544.2024.2322781
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09277544.2024.2322781?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjelxx:v:32:y:2024:i:2:p:57-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjel20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.