Author
Listed:
- Saul Nurick
- Andrew Thatcher
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to identify and critically evaluate previous research that examines the link between green office buildings and the productivity of commercial building occupants. The overarching approach is to highlight and critique the key findings from a variety of researchers that attempt to find links specifically between indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and individual productivity. This is done to develop a theoretical model that links green building features and initiatives (GBFIs) in office buildings to individual productivity and organizational performance. This paper first provides a background of the emergence of green buildings, specifically with regards to utility costs, which led to changes in design and hence to the indoor environment. The core focus of this study is to provide a literature review of the research that attempts to link GBFIs to productivity. Various studies focus on a single or multiple components of GBFIs within different settings, such as controlled laboratory settings, field studies, or longitudinal studies. Other studies choose to focus on occupant health, comfort, and organizational outcomes in relation to GBFIs. The present study attempts to consolidate this area of research by presenting the studies and their findings thus far to develop a new theoretical model. The proposed model links GBFIs to increased individual productivity and organizational performance which results in increased building value, thus justifying the initial capital expenditure for the implementation of GBFIs.
Suggested Citation
Saul Nurick & Andrew Thatcher, 2021.
"The Relationship of Green Office Buildings to Occupant Productivity and Organizational Performance: A Literature Review,"
Journal of Real Estate Literature, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 18-42, August.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rjelxx:v:29:y:2021:i:1:p:18-42
DOI: 10.1080/09277544.2021.1909316
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjelxx:v:29:y:2021:i:1:p:18-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjel20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.