IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjelxx/v26y2018i2p223-253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review and Extension of Merger and Acquisition Research Between REITs and General Corporations

Author

Listed:
  • John L. Glascock
  • Ying Zhang
  • Tingyu Zhou

Abstract

We review the key differences between the finance and real estate literature on mergers and acquisitions (M&As) from 1980 to 2016. We summarize the differences in M&As between REITs and general corporations. First, REIT mergers are larger than general mergers. In particular, the bid levels of REITs are consistently higher than those of standard business mergers. Second, REIT acquisitions involve fewer all-stock bids and fewer all-cash deals. Third, the deal sizes with mixed payments are much higher than with other payment methods. Fourth, there are very few hostile takeovers in the REIT market but the proportion of hostile takeovers in REITs does not differ from conventional firms. Fifth, the average deal value of REIT private-to-public takeovers is higher than public-to-public takeovers and the average deal value of REIT public-to-private takeovers is higher than private-to-private or other-private M&As. Finally, researchers have not examined the use of REITs that could help move real estate assets into better managed and use form; thus this will provide fruitful research ideas in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • John L. Glascock & Ying Zhang & Tingyu Zhou, 2018. "A Review and Extension of Merger and Acquisition Research Between REITs and General Corporations," Journal of Real Estate Literature, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 223-253, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjelxx:v:26:y:2018:i:2:p:223-253
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2018.12090484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2018.12090484
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2018.12090484?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjelxx:v:26:y:2018:i:2:p:223-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjel20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.