IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjelxx/v25y2017i1p237-251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Need to Reference Automatic Valuation Models to The Valuation Process

Author

Listed:
  • Donald Epley

Abstract

Computer-assisted estimates of market value should be in compliance with the Uniform Standards and be controlled by the well-known valuation process that all certified appraisers follow. This action would resolve a major discrepancy that exists in the market in the interpretation of the model estimate. One group calls the result “market value,” in contrast to a large other group that views it as only a “price.” The government regulations and academic literature contain both discussions, which lead to a difference in concept as to the content of each computer-assisted model. Evaluations of each automatic valuation model for potential use should be based on accuracy, qualifications of the model builder and user, number of properties, amount of supervision, and interpretation of results, and perhaps, profit potential to the underwriter. Comparisons among models will remain minimal as long as they continue to show commercial potential. The practicing appraiser using computer methods to analyze market trends and produce a market price should be aware of current AVM developments.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald Epley, 2017. "The Need to Reference Automatic Valuation Models to The Valuation Process," Journal of Real Estate Literature, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 237-251, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjelxx:v:25:y:2017:i:1:p:237-251
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2017.12090450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2017.12090450
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2017.12090450?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjelxx:v:25:y:2017:i:1:p:237-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjel20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.