Author
Abstract
Kenya recognizes tourism as an important economic sector with significant potential to contribute to the national gross domestic product (GDP) and to the country's sustainable development goals. Ecotourism ideals intend to enable communities to benefit from the use of natural and cultural resources available to them by fostering sustainable socio-economic development while maintaining the integrity of those resources. Presently, participation in ecotourism and sustainable development is an issue of contention; mounting criticism due to lack of substantive outcomes, on the one hand, are weighed against conventional tourism characterized by the absence of community participation altogether, producing progressive discourse with the potential to revolutionize conceptualization and practice of participation. To engage with this debate, the objective of this study was to explore individual and household experiences of long-term participation in Kimana Community Wildlife Sanctuary, a former flagship ecotourism initiative in Kenya. Using secondary data, in-depth interviews, a survey, and participant observation in the community hosting the sanctuary, the study found conflicting experiences of participation, especially in the conceptualization and operation of their communal ecotourism initiative. Even though the initiative has been reported as being inclusive and profitable, the study found differentiated experiences of participation, some of which were congruent and others incongruent with the positive ecotourism outcomes previously reported for this initiative. The study advocates reflexive participation by the community together with national and local institutional changes in order to substantiate community power to impact meaningfully upon the performance of community-based ecotourism partnerships.
Suggested Citation
Cynthia Amati, 2013.
"“We all voted for it”: experiences of participation in community-based ecotourism from the foothills of Mt Kilimanjaro,"
Journal of Eastern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 650-670, November.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:7:y:2013:i:4:p:650-670
DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2013.841023
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:7:y:2013:i:4:p:650-670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjea .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.