IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjeaxx/v18y2024i2p240-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Has Kenya democratized? Institutional strengthening and contingency in the 2022 general elections

Author

Listed:
  • Nic Cheeseman
  • Karuti Kanyinga
  • Gabrielle Lynch
  • Justin Willis

Abstract

Kenya’s 2022 general elections saw – for only the second time in the country’s history – a transfer of power from a retiring president to a candidate that they had not backed. Moreover, despite accusations of electoral malpractice, the Supreme Court upheld the results, fewer petitions were submitted for lower-level races, and political unrest around the election itself was relatively minor. This has led some commentators to speculate that Kenya’s political institutions are becoming robust and that the power of ethnicity is waning – and hence that the country is on a steady path towards democratic consolidation. We counsel against this interpretation, arguing that the 2022 polls were anything but a formality, and rested, at least in part, on a set of contingent factors that may not be reproduced. It is thus important to understand both the structural changes that have transformed Kenyan politics and the challenges that remain. We undertake such an appraisal by considering three areas often seen to be the building blocks of a high-quality democracy: the strength of democratic institutions, how politicians seek to mobilise support, and the independence and vibrancy of civil society and the media.

Suggested Citation

  • Nic Cheeseman & Karuti Kanyinga & Gabrielle Lynch & Justin Willis, 2024. "Has Kenya democratized? Institutional strengthening and contingency in the 2022 general elections," Journal of Eastern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 240-260, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:18:y:2024:i:2:p:240-260
    DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2024.2359154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17531055.2024.2359154
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17531055.2024.2359154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:18:y:2024:i:2:p:240-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjea .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.