IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjeaxx/v13y2019i3p465-484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The limits of Malawian headmen’s agency in co-constructed development practice and narratives

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas McNamara

Abstract

Seeking to foreground the role of local agency in development practice, anthropologists laud chieftaincy for its ability to reshape development projects and narratives. However, studies commonly focus on the higher ranks of hierarchical chieftaincies or present chieftaincy as a homogenous and unified institution. This has led to an overstatement of sub-chiefs’ ability to influence development projects and discourses. This article explores the relationship between Malawian villagers and three NGOs, Mbwezi, Nkuvira and GreenEarth. The former two had permanent offices in a small Malawian community, their wealth and the westernization-as-development they promised, prevented village headmen (the lowest strata of Malawian chief) from credulously linking development to traditional rule. The latter’s work in a village distant from its office was utilized by a headman to enhance his legitimacy. This article explores the interplay between village headmen’s agency, chiefly hierarchies and international development signifiers. It argues that headmen’s involvement in a development activity neither inherently confers legitimacy to a project nor represents a local co-creation of development.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas McNamara, 2019. "The limits of Malawian headmen’s agency in co-constructed development practice and narratives," Journal of Eastern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 465-484, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:13:y:2019:i:3:p:465-484
    DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2019.1599196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17531055.2019.1599196
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17531055.2019.1599196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:13:y:2019:i:3:p:465-484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjea .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.