IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjeaxx/v11y2017i1p188-209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The politics of the Luweero skulls: the making of memorial heritage and post-revolutionary state legitimacy over the Luweero mass graves in Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Pauline Bernard

Abstract

In Uganda, the 1981–1986 civil war mainly took place in the “Luweero Triangle” area where the National Resistance Army/Movement (NRA/M) guerrillas were based, fighting against the Obote regime’s regular army. The war resulted in an estimated 50,000–300,000 civilian deaths in this region. At the end of the war, thousands of unidentified human remains were found in the area in forms of skulls and bones. The Luweero skulls and bones would later be politically used through memorialization by the victorious NRA/M as a “scarecrow” propaganda instrument. Used from the early aftermath of the war, and especially during the 1996 elections, it aimed to mark the contrast between the terror of the previous Obote regime and the ruling NRM government, which prides itself on having brought peace and security in the country, consolidating the post-revolutionary state’s legitimacy. This article, based on archives and fieldwork interviews, explores the fate, memorial heritage making and political use of the Luweero skulls and bones in an historical perspective. It questions the political effectiveness of this instrumentalization of fear, as well as the success of the memorial heritage building to which the Luweero skulls were subjected, and finally discusses the conflicts that emerged from these policies between the central government and local Luweero residents and leaders.

Suggested Citation

  • Pauline Bernard, 2017. "The politics of the Luweero skulls: the making of memorial heritage and post-revolutionary state legitimacy over the Luweero mass graves in Uganda," Journal of Eastern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 188-209, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:188-209
    DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2017.1288959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17531055.2017.1288959
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17531055.2017.1288959?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:188-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjea .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.