IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjeaxx/v10y2016i4p769-788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Land belongs to the people of Uganda”: politicians’ use of land issues in the 2016 election campaigns

Author

Listed:
  • Lotte Meinert
  • Anne Mette Kjær

Abstract

Politicians running for the 2016 elections in Uganda used land issues in various ways to mobilize votes. We explore the ways in which land was politicized during election campaigns, by examining the personal manifestos and rallies of candidates in the districts of Kaabong and Gulu, and in Kampala. Our main argument is that land was often constitutive of programmatic political debate, and was not only used in instrumental and patrimonial ways to mobilize votes. The most significant ways in which land was used in the election were to: raise questions of authorities’ and investors’ claims and “land-grabbing”; start discussions about land development, sale, and forms of tenure; buy votes with land (promises or access); encourage squatting on investors’ land to create conflicts over claims and gain popularity, and thus, votes; and raise issues about ethnicity, territorial rights, and autochthony.

Suggested Citation

  • Lotte Meinert & Anne Mette Kjær, 2016. "“Land belongs to the people of Uganda”: politicians’ use of land issues in the 2016 election campaigns," Journal of Eastern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 769-788, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:10:y:2016:i:4:p:769-788
    DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2016.1274251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17531055.2016.1274251
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17531055.2016.1274251?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:10:y:2016:i:4:p:769-788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjea .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.