IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjapxx/v29y2024i3p1437-1461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does China’s direct investment in ASEAN have institutional preference from the perspective of investment motivation heterogeneity?

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Siyue
  • Gengzhi Huang
  • Zhang Hongou
  • Ye Yuyao
  • Wu Qitao

Abstract

Location choice for outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) is key to companies’ strategic decision-making on internationalization. We provide a comprehensive framework for Chinese companies selecting OFDI locations based on an eclectic (OLI) paradigm and neo-institutional economics. We reveal that investment motivation and host country’s quality of institutions and bilateral institutional distance play interactive, complex roles in China’s location choice for direct investment in ASEAN. Chinese companies prefer investing in ASEAN countries with better institutional quality, especially higher political stability, absence of violence/terrorism, government regulatory quality, and rule of law. Institutional quality significantly promotes market-seeking, efficiency-seeking, and resource-seeking investments; among institutional quality factors, rule of law and corruption control significantly promote market-seeking, resource-seeking, and efficiency-seeking investments, while regulatory quality and government effectiveness significantly promote market-seeking and efficiency-seeking investment. The better the host country’s institutional quality, the more attractive it is for market-seeking and efficiency-seeking investments, but less for resource-seeking investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Siyue & Gengzhi Huang & Zhang Hongou & Ye Yuyao & Wu Qitao, 2024. "Does China’s direct investment in ASEAN have institutional preference from the perspective of investment motivation heterogeneity?," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 1437-1461, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjapxx:v:29:y:2024:i:3:p:1437-1461
    DOI: 10.1080/13547860.2022.2097372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13547860.2022.2097372
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13547860.2022.2097372?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjapxx:v:29:y:2024:i:3:p:1437-1461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.