IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rherxx/v43y2006i1p71-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pareto on the History of Economic Thought as an Aspect of Experimental Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Michael McLure

Abstract

The reasons for studying the history of economic thought are diverse. The extreme range of reasons includes suggestions that research in this field is: a way of passing time on an intellectual curiosity; an investment in human capital which contributes to a more profound understanding of the development of modern economic theory; an activity of historical interest only, totally devoid of concern with the purely scientific merits of theories; or a subject for sociologists intent on understanding the culture of science and how this has influenced the evolution of scientific knowledge. Interestingly, Pareto had a well-developed idea of the scientific reasons for undertaking histories of economic thought, which he saw as an aspect of ‘experimental economics’. This paper investigates how, and why, Pareto incorporated the history of economic thought as a central element of experimental economics. His approach to the history of economics is shown to be historical, albeit in a very limited sense, and yet non-historical in the sense that it provided data for the development of experimental hypotheses and theory pertaining to the sociological part of the economic phenomenon.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael McLure, 2006. "Pareto on the History of Economic Thought as an Aspect of Experimental Economics," History of Economics Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 71-87, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:43:y:2006:i:1:p:71-87
    DOI: 10.1080/18386318.2006.11681222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/18386318.2006.11681222
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/18386318.2006.11681222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:43:y:2006:i:1:p:71-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rher .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.